MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404732562 · doi:10.5539/mas.v18n1p39

Tidal And Seasonal Effects on Water Quality in the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia

2024· article· en· W4404732562 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siti Nurhidayu, Harun N. Z

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Putra Malaysia
KeywordsMangroveEnvironmental scienceNature reserveForest reserveForestryFisheryGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR) in Malaysia, known for its sustainable management, However, the specific relationships between tidal dynamics, seasonal changes, and water quality parameters within MMFR remain understudied. This study investigates the effects of tidal and seasonal fluctuations on water quality by examining seven parameters—Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity, Temperature, Total Dissolved Solids, pH, Turbidity, and Electric Conductivity—alongside river characteristics such as width, depth, and velocity. In-situ measurements were conducted across dry and wet seasons at both high and low tides to capture variability in water quality. The findings indicate that tidal cycles and seasonal changes significantly influence the parameters studied, with distinct patterns observed in relation to tidal conditions. For instance, salinity and turbidity levels were found to increase during high tide, influenced by seawater intrusion, while dissolved oxygen and temperature varied with seasonal rainfall and evaporation. These fluctuations not only reflect the hydrological processes within MMFR but also highlight the sensitivity of water quality to environmental conditions. Understanding these relationships is essential for developing adaptive management strategies that address the challenges posed by climate change and human impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWetland Management and ConservationFrench-language works237,207