How work self-efficacy can prevent work interference with family from thwarting creative behavior
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study adds to extant management research by addressing hitherto unexplored but highly relevant questions related to how and when employees’ experience of work interference with family translates into a reduced propensity to develop new ideas for organizational improvement, with a particular focus on the mediating role of their intentions to leave and the moderating role of their work self-efficacy in this chain of effects. On the basis of quantitative survey data collected among employees who work in the pharmaceutical retail sector, the empirical findings show that a critical conduit, through which frustrations that work demands spill over into the family sphere lead to dampened creative work efforts, is that employees develop quitting intentions. Yet this explanatory role is less powerful when employees feel confident about their work-related competencies. Notably and somewhat paradoxically, employees’ experience of incompatible work and family demands steers them away from creative work efforts that otherwise could reveal novel solutions. This counterproductive dynamic can be mitigated if employees have greater trust in their own work skills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it