MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404736683 · doi:10.61711/jst.2016.25.2.515

Healing Spirit, Body and Mind Disjoined by Immigration Through Sandplay Therapy

2016· article· en· W4404736683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olga Lipadatova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyImmigrationMind–body problemPsychoanalysisPsychotherapistPhilosophyHistoryEpistemologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents a case study of a woman in her fifties, whose sandplay process spanned about one year. The patient was married with three children. She immigrated to Canada after two prior immigrations. Being a well educated and respected professional, she had to adapt to a very new socio-cultural situation. She became psychologically fragile, which triggered the re-living of the many losses of people she loved, one of whom was her mother. Simultaneously, the client's own motherhood and marriage were brought into question. She started showing signs of depression, gained weight, and began having multiple health concerns. As part of a sandplay research project, she became very engaged in her sandplay process. Through her sandplay, the client experienced transformation which brought about notable changes in her soul, mind, and body. Additionally, it resulted in a change of her attitude to her new life and ability to look for new ways of making herself a part of the collective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild Therapy and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207