MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404737369 · doi:10.61711/jst.2016.25.1.999

At the Crossroads of Life and Death: Inhabiting Body and Psyche

2016· article· en· W4404737369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychePsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This author demonstrates how a sandplay process supports a 5-year-old boy in recovering a sense of autonomy and embodiment after surviving multiple surgeries in the first year of life. Born prematurely and with abdominal complications, the boy experienced early disruption due to the surgeries and hospitalizations. The author explains how the free and protected space of sandplay therapy helped the boy feel more comfortable in his own body so that he could consolidate a new sense of self. For example, the author describes how the boy's use of the symbol of the snake as Kundalini energy helped him achieve a sense of indwelling spirit. Throughout the boy's 4-year therapy process, he showed profound resilience by inhabiting body and psyche in a new way. The ways in which he progressed developmentally are described. This article is a proceeding from "Finding the Stillpoint…at the Crossroads," the 23rd ISST Congress, Ottawa, Canada, 2015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207