Multisensory integration across reference frames with additive feed-forward networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The integration of multiple sensory inputs is essential for human perception and action in uncertain environments. This process includes reference frame transformations as different sensory signals are encoded in different coordinate systems. Studies have shown multisensory integration in humans is consistent with Bayesian optimal inference. However, neural mechanisms underlying this process are still debated. Different population coding models have been proposed to implement probabilistic inference. This includes a recent suggestion that explicit divisive normalization accounts for empirical principles of multisensory integration. However, whether and how divisive operations are implemented in the brain is not well understood. Indeed, all existing models suffer from the curse of dimensionality and thus fail to scale to real-world problems. Here, we propose an alternative model for multisensory integration that approximates Bayesian inference: a multilayer-feedforward neural network of multisensory integration (MSI) across different reference frames trained on the analytical Bayesian solution. This model displays all empirical principles of multisensory integration and produces similar behavior to that reported in Ventral intraparietal (VIP) neurons in the brain. The model achieved this without a neatly organized and regular connectivity structure between contributing neurons, such as required by explicit divisive normalization. Overall, we show that simple feedforward networks of purely additive units can approximate optimal inference across different reference frames through parallel computing principles. This suggests that it is not necessary for the brain to use explicit divisive normalization to achieve multisensory integration. Significance Statement This research presents an alternative model to divisive normalization models of multisensory integration in the brain. Our study demonstrates that a feed-forward neural network can achieve optimal multisensory integration across different reference frames without explicitly implementing divisive operations, challenging the long-held assumption that such operations are necessary for multisensory integration. The model displays all the empirical principles of multisensory integration, producing similar behavior to that reported in Ventral intraparietal (VIP) neurons in the brain. This work offers profound insights into the putative neural computations underlying multisensory processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".