MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404740399 · doi:10.1115/1.4067286

Tetrascatt Model: Born Approximation for the Estimation of Acoustic Dispersion of Fluid-Like Objects of Arbitrary Geometries

2024· article· en· W4404740399 on OpenAlexaff
Edmundo F. Lavia, Guadalupe Cascallares

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of vibration and acoustics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersion (optics)AcousticsAcoustic dispersionPhysicsMathematicsMechanicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsAcoustic waveOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Modeling the acoustic scattering response due to penetrable objects of arbitrary shapes, such as those of many marine organisms, can be computationally intensive, often requiring high-performance computing equipment when considering a completely general situation. However, when the physical properties (sound speed and density) of the scatterer are similar to those of the surrounding medium, the Born approximation provides a computationally efficient way to calculate it. For simple geometrical shapes like spheres and spheroids, the acoustic scattering in the far field evaluated through the Born approximation recipe results in a formula that has been historically employed to predict the response of weakly scattering organisms, such as zooplankton. Further, the Born approximation has been extended to bodies whose geometry can be described as a collection of noncircular rings centered on a smooth curve. In this work, we have developed a numerical approach to calculate the far-field backscattering by arbitrary 3D objects under the Born approximation. The object's geometry is represented by a volumetric mesh composed of tetrahedrons, and the computation is efficiently performed through analytical 3D integration, yielding a solution expressed in terms of elementary functions. On a current desktop PC the model can compute the scattering from meshes with millions of elements in a matter of minutes. This model is able to compute the scattering from a complex shape 200× faster than other methods like the Boundary Element Method, without compromising the numeric quality of the solution. The method's correctness has been successfully validated against benchmark solutions. Additionally, we present acoustic scattering results for species with complex geometries. To enable other researchers to use and validate the method, a computational package named tetrascatt was developed in the R programming language and published in the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of vibration and acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207