The reinvention of an energy hub's planning by considering tidal turbine, bi-facial PV panels, and INVELOX: A unique outlook on the combination performance of novel RERs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ahstract-New approaches must be taken due to the rapid growth of societies globally and the urgent need for more energy, climate change, and global warming. One of these approaches is supporting and expanding new and efficient renewable energy resources (RERs). Therefore, this paper is dedicated to the energy planning and management of the proposed structure in which novel renewable-based technologies such as INVELOX wind turbines, Bi-facial photovoltaic (PV) panels, and tidal turbines (TT), in addition to the demand response programs (DRP) especially time of use (TOU), are investigated. The purpose is to simultaneously reducing the presented system's overall cost and environmental pollution. The problem is modeled as mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) in GAMS software and solved using a CPLEX solver. The final results show that novel technologies recognized as efficient can significantly reduce contamination, expenses, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while supplying our rapidly growing demand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".