MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404743200 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104280

Estimating canopy nitrogen content by coupling PROSAIL-PRO with a nitrogen allocation model

2024· article· en· W4404743200 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Li, Yapeng Wu, Katja Berger, Qianliang Kuang, Wei Feng, Jing M. Chen, Wenhui Wang, Hengbiao Zheng, Xia Yao, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Tao Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanopyNitrogenGeographyEnvironmental scienceMathematicsForestryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• This study coupled PROSAIL-PRO and a nitrogen allocation model (PROSAIL-NAM). • PROSAIL-NAM was proposed to estimate canopy nitrogen content (CNC). • The performance of PROSAIL-NAM on CNC estimation was evaluated using six datasets. • Satisfactory estimations of CNC were obtained for all datasets (RMSE = 0.54–1.56 g/m 2 ). Nitrogen is one of the most important macronutrients for plant growth and timely estimation of canopy nitrogen content (CNC) is crucial for agricultural applications. Remote sensing has emerged as an important tool to quantify CNC using either empirically or physically based methods. Most empirical methods use chlorophyll related spectral indices and are dependent on the relationship between nitrogen and chlorophyll, which varies with vegetation types and growth stages. In contrast, physically based methods use the full-range reflectance data and retrieve CNC from coupled leaf and canopy radiative transfer models (such as PROSPECT-PRO + 4SAIL, PROSAIL-PRO). However, the subtle absorption features of nitrogen and protein in fresh leaves hinder the accurate estimation of CNC. Therefore, this study proposed an efficient and mechanistic framework to estimate CNC (PROSAIL-NAM) by coupling PROSAIL-PRO with a nitrogen allocation model, which divided the total nitrogen into non-photosynthetic nitrogen (NPN) and photosynthetic nitrogen (PN). At the canopy level, PN and NPN are assumed to be proportional to canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) and canopy dry matter content (CDM), respectively. The PROSAIL-PRO model was first used to estimate CCC and CDM, and then the resulting CCC and CDM were fed to the nitrogen allocation model to estimate CNC. The estimation accuracy of CNC was assessed with six diverse datasets: four from field crop experiments across geographic sites, one from multiple ecosystems, and one from a satellite-ground joint experiment. Our results showed that satisfactory estimations of CNC were obtained when CCC and CDM were estimated using a model inversion method (RMSE = 0.54–1.56 g/m 2 ) and a hybrid retrieval method (RMSE = 0.49–2.25 g/m 2 ). The model inversion method was comparable with the hybrid retrieval method for ground platforms, but performed better for airborne and satellite platforms. In addition, the traditional protein-nitrogen conversion model obtained CNC from the canopy protein content and led to clear overestimations of CNC with RMSE > 1.95 g/m 2 . This study represents a first attempt to develop a robust approach by coupling PROSAIL-PRO with a nitrogen allocation model for accurate estimation of CNC across geographic sites, ecosystems, and platforms. These finding will advance the monitoring of CNC from regional to global scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207