Glymphatic dysfunction in non-dialysis, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients with ESRD is associated with cognitive decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivation: The glymphatic function has not yet been explored in non-dialysis,HD and PD patients with ESRD. Goal(s): Our goal was to explore the pattern of glymphatic function in ESRD patients and its relationship with cognitive decline. Approach: Diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index methods was used to investigating brain glymphatic dysfunction in ESRD patients with non-dialysis, HD and PD patients using. The relationship between Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and changes in DTI-ALPS index was measured. Results: Compared with HD and PD, ESRD patients with non-dialysis showed lower DTI-ALPS index.Changed DTI-ALPS index associated with cognitive decline in ESRD patients with non-dialysis. Impact: Our findings reveal a greater degree of aberrant glymphatic functionality in ESRD patients with non-dialysis than HD and PD, which may offer new insights to the effectiveness of dialysis treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".