MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404751169

Clinical observation of electroacupuncture "Tongmin Point" combined with heat-sensitive moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis and its influence on blood lipid level and ADAMTS-4

2021· article· en· W4404751169 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhen Mao, Hongxing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoxibustionADAMTSElectroacupunctureOsteoarthritisMedicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineAcupuncturePathologyAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of electroacupuncture "Tongmin point" combined \nwith heat-sensitive moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis and its effect on blood lipid level, \npolyprotein polysaccharide enzyme-4(a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin \nmotifs, ADAMTS-4, matrix metalloproteinase-3(matrix metalloproteinase-3,); and MMPs-3) \nImpact. Methods: 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 40 cases per group, \nTreatment and control groups, The treatment group was given electroacupuncture combined \nwith heat-sensitive moxibustion, Six times a week, Continuous treatment for 4 weeks; The \ncontrol group was given intraarticular sodium hyaluronate, Once a week, continuous treatment \nfor 4 weeks. Results: During the treatment period, Visual analogue scale visual analogue \nscale, VAS) show a downward trend, Intra-group comparisons, Differences were statistically \nsignificant (P<0.05); After 2 weeks of treatment ,4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks of followup, \nAll the scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). \nAfter treatment in two groups (The Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Osteoarthritis \nIndex,) of osteoarthritis index, University of Western Ontario WOMAC) The scores of each \nitem decreased significantly, treatment group was better than the control group (P<0.05). After \nfour weeks of treatment, (Total cholesterol,) Total cholesterol TC, triglycerides (Triglyceride,); \nand TG, LDL (Low density lipoprotein,); and LDL-C) A decrease in content, High density \nlipoprotein High density lipoprotein, HDL-C) Increased content, and the improvement was \nbetter than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the ADAMTS-4, MMPs-3 \ncontent decreased, Intergroup comparisons, Differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); \nThe effective rate in the treatment group was 87.5%, The control rate was 60%, treatment \ngroup was more effective (P<0.05). Conclusions: Electroacupuncture "Tongmin point" \ncombined with heat-sensitive moxibustion can obviously improve the symptoms of knee \nosteoarthritis patients, Regulate blood lipids, High security, It is worth popularizing in clinic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207