MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404753768 · doi:10.1515/bgsl-2024-0049

<b>Olivia Kobiela</b>: <i>ÄsthEthik der Fremde</i> <i>des</i> ›<i>Herzog Ernst B‹</i>. Die Kartographie des 12./13. Jahrhunderts als ästhEthisches Reflexionsmedium der mittelalterlichen Literatur, Paderborn: Brill Fink 2022, 366 S. (MittelalterStudien 33)

2024· article· de· W4404753768 on OpenAlexaff
Markus Stock

Bibliographic record

VenueBeiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtBrillPhilosophyClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBeiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)Same topicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207