MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404755568 · doi:10.3390/ph17121601

Diverse Applications of the Anti-Diabetic Drug Metformin in Treating Human Disease

2024· review· en· W4404755568 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris-Tiann Roberts, Lara Wiegand, Ashraf Kadar Shahib, Mojgan Rastegar

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmaceuticals · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMetforminMedicineDrug repositioningDrugRepurposingContext (archaeology)PharmacologyDiseaseType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusClinical trialBioinformaticsInternal medicineBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metformin is a commonly used drug for treating type 2 diabetes. Metformin is an inexpensive drug with low/no side effects and is well tolerated in human patients of different ages. Recent therapeutic strategies for human disease have considered the benefits of drug repurposing. This includes the use of the anti-diabetic drug metformin. Accordingly, the anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-viral, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective potentials of metformin have deemed it a suitable candidate for treating a plethora of human diseases. As results from preclinical studies using cellular and animal model systems appear promising, clinical trials with metformin in the context of non-diabetes-related illnesses have been started. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the therapeutic potential of metformin in different animal models of human disease and its suggested relationship to epigenetics and ailments with epigenetic components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmaceuticalsSame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207