MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404756186 · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100949

mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety among children and adolescents: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network cohort study

2024· article· en· W4404756186 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Phyumar Soe, Otto G. Vanderkooi, Manish Sadarangani, Monika Naus, Matthew Muller, James D. Kellner, Karina A. Top, Hubert Wong, Jennifer E. Isenor, Kimberly Marty, Hennady P. Shulha, Gaston De Serres, Louis Valiquette, Allison McGeer, Julie A. Bettinger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité LavalInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversity of TorontoBC Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityAlberta Children's HospitalBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Immunization Research NetworkMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalPublic Health Agency of CanadaChildren's Hospital FoundationPublic Health Agency
KeywordsVaccine safetyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)CohortMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Environmental health2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyImmunizationImmunologyOutbreakInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network conducted active safety surveillance for COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to characterize the short-to-medium term safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines across the pediatric age spectrum. Methods: In this cohort study, vaccinated and unvaccinated children and adolescents aged 6 months to 19 years from eight Canadian provinces and territories were invited to participate. The outcome was a health event preventing daily activities, resulting in school absenteeism, or requiring medical consultation. Age-stratified multivariable regression models were used to examine health events associated with first and second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines across different age groups: children under 5, children aged 5-11 years and adolescents aged 12-19 years. Findings: From January 2021 through February 2023, a total of 259,361 individuals from the dose one survey, 131,032 from the dose 2 survey, and 1179 from the control survey were included. In the week following dose two, vaccinated adolescents showed a higher proportion of health events [794 (4.6%) of 17,218 BNT162b2 recipients, 98 (8.5%) of 1153 mRNA-1273 recipients, 49 of (10.6%) of 464 heterologous schedule recipients] than unvaccinated adolescents [9 (3.7%) of 242 controls], but most events were self-limited and resolved within 7 days. No significant differences in proportion of health events following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were observed between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups among adolescents after dose 1, or among children under 5 or those aged 5-11 years after any dose. Reported myocarditis/pericarditis cases within 0-28 days peaked among male adolescents following dose 2, in three of (0.037%) 8088 homologous BNT162b2 recipients, and two of (0.529%) 378 homologous mRNA-1273 recipients. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that reported health events, including myocarditis/pericarditis, vary by pediatric age group. Vaccinated adolescents reported health events more frequently following the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose, while younger age groups did not report events more frequently than their unvaccinated counterparts. Funding: Canadian Immunization Research Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency of Canada; COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - AmericasSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207