Los engaños temporales del oso. La producción de una reserva en el Pirineo catalán basada en la restauración de un paisaje
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El éxito biológico del programa de reintroducción del oso pardo en los Pirineos, pasando de cinco ejemplares en 1996 a más de setenta en la actualidad, contrasta con la permanencia de un conflicto social con el sector ganadero. Para entender mejor esa conflictividad, este artículo examina cómo la producción de la reserva del oso se basa en un engaño temporal: la restauración de un paisaje pretérito al amparo del discurso de la patrimonialización. Este análisis se desarrolla comparativamente con la producción de la reserva de Baqueira Beret, sustentada en el reemplazo de un pasado ganadero por un presente turístico. Sin embargo, desde el prisma de la historicidad etnográfica, tanto la restauración como el reemplazo se fundamentan en el engaño temporal de diluir los nexos entre pasado, presente y futuro propios de cualquier transformación paisajística.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".