MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404759697 · doi:10.26871/rdg.v2i4.29

LA INTELIGENCIA DE NEGOCIOS COMO APOYO A LA TOMA DE DECISIONES EN EL ÁREA DE COMERCIALIZACIÓN DE LA EMPRESA AZUAYNET

2023· article· es· W4404759697 on OpenAlexaff
Marisela Elizabeth Arévalo Valarezo, Paola Noemí Neira Picón

Bibliographic record

VenueDECISION GERENCIAL · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsProcess Research Ortech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La globalización de los mercados y la incorporación de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, requiere de las organizaciones una serie de estrategias que refuercen sus operaciones en respuesta al entorno complejo y competitivo en el que ejercen. En este contexto los sistemas de inteligencia de negocios (BI) desempeñan un papel fundamental, puesto que comprenden aplicaciones y herramientas que facilitan la carga, análisis, extracción y reporte de información valiosa para orientar la correcta toma de decisiones, que en el caso de la empresa Azuaynet es limitada, imprecisa y de bajo alcance en su proceso de comercialización, por lo que el objetivo de este artículo es diseñar una arquitectura tecnológica de inteligencia de negocios que faculte la adecuada toma de decisiones. Los resultados reflejan información relevante para que los directivos puedan gestionar con eficacia y eficiencia la operación comercial. La investigación proporciona una herramienta que garantiza la obtención de un punto de vista global de la actividad comercial para la mejora de su competitividad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDECISION GERENCIALSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207