Graphene-Based Fiber Materials for Gas Sensing Applications: State of the Art Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of gas sensors is apparent as the detection of gases and pollutants is crucial for environmental monitoring and human safety. Gas sensing devices also hold the potential for medical applications as health monitoring and disease diagnostic tools. Gas sensors fabricated from graphene-based fibers present a promising advancement in the field of sensing technology due to their enhanced sensitivity and selectivity. The diverse chemical and mechanical properties of graphene-based fibers-such as high surface area, flexibility, and structural stability-establish them as ideal gas-sensing materials. Most significantly, graphene fibers can be readily tuned to detect a wide range of gases, making them highly versatile in gas-sensing technologies. This review focuses on graphene-based composite fibers for gas sensors, with an emphasis on the preparation processes used to achieve these fibers and the gas sensing mechanisms involved in their sensors. Graphene fiber gas sensors are presented based on the chemical composition of their target gases, with detailed discussions on their sensitivity and performance. This review reveals that graphene-based fibers can be prepared through various methods and can be effectively integrated into gas-sensing devices for a diverse range of applications. By presenting an overview of developments in this field over the past decade, this review highlights the potential of graphene-based fiber sensors and their prospective integration into future technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".