MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404765006 · doi:10.3390/healthcare12232380

Understanding Early Risk Factors of Preschool Disruptive Behaviors in a Population-Based Birth Cohort: Why Does Comorbidity Matter?

2024· article· en· W4404765006 on OpenAlexafffund
René Carbonneau, Frank Vitaro, Mara Brendgen, Michel Boivin, Richard E. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalResearch Unit on Children's Psychosocial MaladjustmentUniversité du Québec à MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComorbidityCohortImpulsivityPopulationRisk factorCohort studyMedicinePsychologyAggressionDemographyPediatricsDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Research on early risk factors for disruptive behaviors (DBs: hyperactivity–impulsivity/HI, non-compliance/NC, or physical aggression/PA) has predominantly focused on individual DBs in silos (i.e., HI, NC, or PA) or the broader category of externalizing, reporting mostly common risk factors among them. However, studies addressing DB comorbidity, i.e., the simultaneous occurrence of more than one DB, showed differences in risk factors among DB comorbid profiles. Aiming to clarify this discrepancy, the present study compared the early risk factors associated with different longitudinal patterns (i.e., trajectories) of single-DBs (HI, NC, PA) with risk factors associated with monomorbid (HIonly, NConly, PAonly) and comorbid (HI + NC, NC + PA, HI + NC + PA) joint-DBs trajectories during the preschool period. Methods: In a population-based birth cohort (N = 2045), parents’ pre-conception characteristics, pregnancy and perinatal conditions, and age 5 months child and family characteristics were used to compare children following single-DB and joint-DBs high trajectories to children following low or moderate trajectories. The DB trajectories were derived from mother ratings at ages 1½, 2½, 3½, 4½, and 5 years. Results: More risk factors were identified for single-DB high trajectories than for joint-DBs high trajectories. On average, children on a single-DB high trajectory shared only 44.2% of their risk factors with children on a related joint-DBs high trajectory. Moreover, high trajectories of single-DBs shared a larger proportion of their risk factors than did high trajectories of joint-DBs. The findings show that categories of DBs include different subgroups of children based on their comorbidity patterns across DBs, which are differentially linked to early risk factors. Conclusions: Addressing comorbidity when investigating early risk factors of preschool DBs may improve our understanding of the etiological processes leading to these distinct but related behaviors and increase our ability to intervene upstream to prevent the earliest forms of potentially life-altering psychopathological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207