MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404765576 · doi:10.5194/ejm-36-943-2024

Pressure–temperature–time and REE mineral evolution in low- to medium-grade polymetamorphic units (Austroalpine Unit, Eastern Alps)

2024· article· en· W4404765576 on OpenAlexafffund
Marianne Sophie Hollinetz, Benjamin Huet, David Schneider, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Ralf Schuster, Gerd Rantitsch, Philip Schantl, Christoph Iglseder, Martin Reiser, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mineralogy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeochemistryGeologyMineralMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated rare earth element (REE) minerals in low- to medium-grade metapelites sampled in two nappes of the Austroalpine Unit (Eastern Alps, Austria). Combining microstructural and chemical characterization of the main and REE minerals with thermodynamic forward modeling, Raman spectroscopy on carbonaceous material (RSCM) thermometry and in situ U–Th–Pb dating reveal a polymetamorphic evolution of all samples. In the hanging wall nappe, allanite and REE epidote formed during Permian metamorphism (275–261 Ma, 475–520 °C, 0.3–0.4 GPa). In one sample, Cretaceous (ca. 109 Ma) REE epidote formed at ∼440 °C and 0.4–0.8 GPa at the expense of Permian monazite clusters. In the footwall nappe, large, chemically zoned monazite porphyroblasts record both Permian (283–256 Ma, 560 °C, 0.4 GPa) and Cretaceous (ca. 87 Ma, 550 °C, 1.0–1.1 GPa) metamorphism. Polymetamorphism produced a wide range of complex REE-mineral-phase relationships and microstructures. Despite the complexity, we found that bulk rock Ca, Al and Na contents are the main factor controlling REE mineral stability; variations thereof explain differences in the REE mineral assemblages of samples with identical pressure and temperature ( P – T ) paths. Therefore, REE minerals are also excellent geochronometers to resolve the metamorphic evolution of low- to medium-grade rocks in complex tectonic settings. The recognition that the main metamorphic signature in the hanging wall is Permian implies a marked P – T difference of ∼250 °C and at least 0.5 GPa, requiring a major normal fault between the two nappes which accommodated the exhumation of the footwall in the Cretaceous. Due to striking similarities in setting and timing, we put this low-angle detachment in context with other Late Cretaceous low-angle detachments from the Austroalpine domain. Together, they form an extensive crustal structure that we tentatively term the “Austroalpine Detachment System”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of MineralogySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207