MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404768589 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451121

COMAP Pathfinder – Season 2 results

2024· article· en· W4404768589 on OpenAlexafffund
J. G. S. Lunde, Nils-Ole Stutzer, Patrick C. Breysse, Dongwoo T. Chung, Kieran Cleary, Delaney A. Dunne, H. K. Eriksen, Stuart Harper, H. T. Ihle, James W. Lamb, T. J. Pearson, Liju Philip, I. K. Wehus, D. P. Woody, J. Richard Bond, S. Church, T. Gaier, Joshua Ott Gundersen, A. I. Harris, Richard J. Hobbs, Junhan Kim, C. R. Lawrence, Norman Murray, Hamsa Padmanabhan, A. C. S. Readhead, Thomas J. Rennie, D. Tolgay

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersJet Propulsion LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of TorontoNational Research FoundationNorges ForskningsrådCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUK Space AgencyKeck Institute for Space StudiesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPathfinderPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CO Mapping Array Project (COMAP) Pathfinder is performing line intensity mapping of CO emission to trace the distribution of unresolved galaxies at redshift z ∼ 3. We present an improved version of the COMAP data processing pipeline and apply it to the first two Seasons of observations. This analysis improves on the COMAP Early Science (ES) results in several key aspects. On the observational side, all second season scans were made in constant-elevation mode, after noting that the previous Lissajous scans were associated with increased systematic errors; those scans accounted for 50% of the total Season 1 data volume. In addition, all new observations were restricted to an elevation range of 35–65 degrees to minimize sidelobe ground pickup. On the data processing side, more effective data cleaning in both the time and map domain allowed us to eliminate all data-driven power spectrum-based cuts. This increases the overall data retention and reduces the risk of signal subtraction bias. However, due to the increased sensitivity, two new pointing-correlated systematic errors have emerged, and we introduced a new map-domain PCA filter to suppress these errors. Subtracting only five out of 256 PCA modes, we find that the standard deviation of the cleaned maps decreases by 67% on large angular scales, and after applying this filter, the maps appear consistent with instrumental noise. Combining all of these improvements, we find that each hour of raw Season 2 observations yields on average 3.2 times more cleaned data compared to the ES analysis. Combining this with the increase in raw observational hours, the effective amount of data available for high-level analysis is a factor of eight higher than in the ES analysis. The resulting maps have reached an uncertainty of 25–50 μK per voxel, providing by far the strongest constraints on cosmological CO line emission published to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207