MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404768704 · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103400

Prediction of the upright articulated spine shape in the operating room using conditioned neural kernel fields

2024· article· en· W4404768704 on OpenAlexafffund
Sylvain Thibeault, Marjolaine Roy‐Beaudry, Stefan Parent, Samuel Kadoury

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Image Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de QuébecChung Hua UniversityCompute Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSPINE (molecular biology)Computer visionArtificial neural networkKernel (algebra)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsMachine learningBiologyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anterior vertebral tethering (AVT) is a non-invasive spine surgery technique, treating severe spine deformations and preserving lower back mobility. However, patient positioning and surgical strategies greatly influences postoperative results. Predicting the upright geometry from pediatric spines is needed to optimize patient positioning in the operating room (OR) and improve surgical outcomes, but remains a complex task due to immature bone properties. We propose a framework used in the OR predicting the upright spine geometry at the first visit following surgery in idiopathic scoliosis patients. The approach first creates a 3D model of the spine while the patient is on the operating table. For this, multiview Transformers that combine images from different viewpoints are used to generate the intraoperative pose. The postoperative upright shape is then predicted on-the-fly using implicit neural fields, which are trained from geometries at different time points and conditioned with surgical parameters. A Signed Distance Function for shape constellations is used to handle the variability in spine appearance, capturing a disentangled latent domain of the articulation vectors, with separate encoding vectors representing both articulation and shape parameters. A regularization criterion based on a pre-trained group-wise trajectory of spine transformations generates complete spine models. A training set of 652 patients with 3D models was used to train the model, tested on a distinct cohort of 83 surgical patients. The framework based on neural kernels predicted upright 3D geometries with a mean 3D error of 1 . 3 ± 0 . 5 mm in landmarks points, and IoU of 95.9% in vertebral shapes when compared to actual postop models, falling within the acceptable margins of error below 2 mm. • We introduce a forecasting method of the standing spine shape during surgery. • An articulated neural kernel field disentangles spine’s latent representations. • An articulation/shape network is used to generate the standing shape. • Multi-view model based on view-divergent Transformers infers intra-op 3D model. • Clinical efficacy is demonstrated in spine surgery plans with several deformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Image AnalysisSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207