АККУМУЛЯЦИЯ ЛАТЕНТНОГО ВАРВАРСТВА В АФИНАХ V В. ДО Н.Э., ИЛИ ПУТЬ В БЕЗДНУ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В V в. до н.э. Афины в результате успехов в Греко-персидских войнах небывало усилились и стали претендовать на лидерство в Греции, вступив в борьбу со Спартой за гегемонию. Геродот в своем труде имплицитно предостерегал, что Афины, победившие восточную варварскую империю, рискуют превратиться в некое ее подобие, а это чревато опасностями и даже крахом. Предостережение оказалось пророческим: на протяжении V в. до н.э. в Афинском морском союзе наблюдалась постепенная аккумуляция латентного варварства. В статье рассматриваются некоторые релевантные эпизоды из политических биографий ведущих афинских государственных деятелей этого столетия: Фемистокла, Кимона, Перикла, Клеона, Алкивиада. Результат подобного развития событий был действительно плачевен: в период Пелопоннесской войны латентная варваризация социума являлась уже очевидной, и это стало одной из причин, обусловивших поражение Афин и крушение реализовывавшегося в них «великого проекта». In the 5th century B.C. Athens, as a result of its successes in the Greco-Persian Wars, strengthened unprecedentedly and started pretending leadership in Greece, having begun struggle against Sparta for hegemony. Herodotus in his treatise warned implicitly that Athens, having defeated the Eastern barbarian empire, was risking to change into a kind of it, and that could lead to dangers and even collapse. The warning proved to be prophetic: during the 5th century B.C., in the Athenian League there was manifest gradual accumulation of latent barbarity. The article deals with some relevant episodes from political biographies of leading Athenian statesman of that century: Themistocles, Cimon, Pericles, Cleon, Alcibiades. The result of such developments was really pitiful: during the Peloponnesian War, latent barbarization of the society was already clear, and it was one of the causes, which conditioned Athens’ defeat and crash of the “Great Project” that was in realization there.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".