MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404775404 · doi:10.21267/aquilo.2020.9.9.002

«ЛОВУШКА» НА ПУТИ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ РАННЕГО ЭТНОГЕНЕЗА МОЛДАВАН: ПО СЛЕДАМ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ СОВЕТСКИХ УЧЕНЫХ

2020· article· ru· W4404775404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueЦивилизация и варварство · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLatvijas UniversitateDanmarks GrundforskningsfondSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNational Research FoundationUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of CincinnatiMcGill UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityDumbarton Oaks Research Library and CollectionAmerican Philological Association
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статья посвящена проблеме изучения раннего этногенеза молдаван. Авторы показывают, какую лепту в историографию вопроса в свое время внесли труды советских исследователей — историков, этнографов, археологов, лингвистов, работавших в Кишинёве и в Москве. The article is devoted to the problem of studying the early ethnogenesis of Moldavians. The authors show what contribution to the historiography of the issue at the time was made by the works of Soviet researchers — historians, ethnographers, archaeologists, linguists who worked in Kishinev and Moscow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it