MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploring the Effects of Incorporating Different Bioactive Phospholipids into Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Lipid Nanoparticle (mRNA LNP) Formulations

2024· article· en· W4404779687 on OpenAlexafffund
Sunny P. Chen, Shuangyu Wang, Suiyang Liao, Anna K. Blakney

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Bio & Med Chem Au · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMichael Smith Health Research BCNanoMedicines Innovation Network
KeywordsPhospholipidChemistryBiochemistryHeLaMessenger RNACellMembraneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current rapid advancement in ribonucleic acid (RNA) therapeutics research depends on innovations in drug delivery, especially the development of a lipid-nanoparticle (LNP)-based system. The conventional LNP formulation typically contains four components, including an ionizable cationic lipid, a phospholipid, cholesterol or a cholesterol derivative, and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-lipid, with each contributing to the formulation's overall stability and effectiveness. Among these four types of lipids, the phospholipid component is often known to provide structural support for the nanoparticles but is also a class of bioactive molecules with strong cell signaling potential. This study explores the possibility of incorporating some known structurally related bioactive phospholipids as the fifth component of a conventional four-component LNP formulation and assesses the impacts of such an approach on the physicochemical properties and biological functions of the mRNA LNP formulation. We screened a library of mRNA LNP formulations containing 7 different structurally related bioactive phospholipids at molar concentrations of 5%, 15% and 30% in addition to a conventional four-component LNP formulation (base). We observed differences in physicochemical properties between the mRNA LNP formulations that could be attributed to both the types of phospholipids examined and the molar concentrations used. Cryo-EM analysis revealed structural similarity between the Base formulation and the other formulations. We also characterized the protein expression level in HeLa cells and picked up a distinct cytokine panel signature for each formulation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs). Further immunophenotyping analysis showed that most cells that were transfected were CD4+ T cells, and the addition of the different bioactive phospholipids slightly altered cellular tropism. This exploratory study illustrates how adding the bioactive phospholipid can be used to modulate the LNP function, further expanding the design space for RNA LNP formulations and potentiating LNPs for use as RNA therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Bio & Med Chem AuSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207