MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404782555 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.26.625312

RNA programmable cell targeting and manipulation with CellREADR

2024· preprint· en· W4404782555 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolu Yang, Kehali Woldemichael, John Hover, Shengli Zhao, Xiao Guo, Yongjun Qian, Jesse Gillis, Zheng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNAADARComputational biologyTranslation (biology)BiologyCellRNA editingEffectorCell biologyComputer scienceMessenger RNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methods that provide specific, easy, and scalable experimental access to animal cell types and cell states will have broad applications in biology and medicine. CellREADR - Cell access through RNA sensing by Endogenous ADAR (adenosine deaminase acting on RNA), is a programmable RNA sensor-actuator technology that couples the detection of a cell-defining RNA to the translation of an effector protein to monitor and manipulate the cell. The CellREADR RNA device consists of a 5' sensor region complementary to a cellular RNA and a 3' payload coding region; payload translation is gated by the removal of a STOP codon in the sensor region upon base pairing with the cognate cellular RNA through an ADAR-mediated A- to-I editing mechanism ubiquitous to metazoan cells. CellREADR thus highlights the potential for RNA-based monitoring and manipulation of animal cells in ways that are simple, versatile, and generalizable across tissues and species. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for implementing CellREADR experiments in cell cultures and in animals. The procedure includes sensor and payload design, cloning, validation and characterization in mammalian cell cultures. The in vivo animal protocol focuses on AAV-based delivery of CellREADR using brain tissue as examples. We describe current best practices, various experimental controls and trouble-shooting steps. Beginning from sensor design, the validation of RNA sensor-actuators in cell cultures can be completed in 2-3 weeks. The construction of AAV vectors and their in vivo validation and characterization will take additional 6-8 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207