MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404787508 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2024.3487893

Intelligent Energy Management for Multistorey Building With Photovoltaic-Based Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure

2024· article· en· W4404787508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Jajini, N. Shanmuga Vadivoo, Sivasankar Gangatharan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usage of electric vehicles (EVs) has increased and it leads to additional demand along with existing residential demand and managing it becomes challenging. Further EV charging systems that function during the daytime in multistorey buildings expedite the peak loading. The main objective of this work is to minimize the operating cost of the system and conversion losses. In this work, the microgrid incorporated with a bidirectional converter plays a major role in dc-ac and ac-dc conversion. The photo voltaic (PV) sources support the system with sufficient dc power generation and batteries store the dc power and supply the load in case of insufficiency. By utilizing a genetic algorithm (GA) and appropriate energy management (EM) to charge EVs according to time-of-use tariff patterns, the impact of growing demand on the grid is greatly mitigated. To ease the burden on the grid during peak hours, the interruptible loads are shifted to off-peak times. Other challenges of EV charging such as energy saving, maximum peak demand, voltage instability, and high current drawing issues are rectified and well presented with existing topology. When compared to the standard scheme, the energy savings in the proposed topology are much increased, reaching 33.04%, while the cost reduction is 57.27%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207