MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404787748 · doi:10.1007/s00431-024-05823-w

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of CNO in children: a clinician’s perspective

2024· review· en· W4404787748 on OpenAlexafffund
Clément Triaille, Jean Jacques De Bruycker, Marie‐Claude Miron, Frédéric Lecouvet, Hermann Girschick, Carine Wouters

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pediatrics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCHU Sainte-Justine FoundationWallonie-Bruxelles International
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineDiseaseClinical trialNarrative reviewPathogenesisBioinformaticsPediatricsImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is caused by aseptic inflammation of bones, primarily driven by the innate immune system. CNO may display different clinical presentations (acute vs chronic, uni- vs multifocal) and is accompanied by other inflammatory disorders in up to a third of patients. Once considered a rare disorder, it has become clear that many patients were underdiagnosed. With increasing awareness and the development of total-body MRI protocols, CNO recognition and diagnosis have greatly improved. Our knowledge of the clinical manifestations and outcomes of CNO has been refined in recent years, especially thanks to the recruitment of large international series. Similarly, new insights into the pathogenesis have been gained by the development of mice models and identification of rare monogenic diseases that resemble CNO. Unfortunately, these advances have not been paralleled in the therapeutic management. In the absence of prospective controlled trials, therapeutic strategies still rely on low-level evidence studies. About half of the patients respond to first-line therapies, but a more refractory and/or chronic disease course requires additional treatments. This narrative review aims to provide the practicing physician with an update on CNO pathogenesis, clinical presentation, associated inflammatory conditions, and diagnostic investigations, and includes a concise summary of current therapeutic recommendations. CONCLUSION: While major progresses have been made in the recognition and management of CNO, significant challenges remain, in particular regarding the treatment of refractory patients, and those with associated inflammatory disorders. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Many physicians caring for children will encounter patients suffering of (suspected) CNO. CNO diagnosis requires exclusion of numerous conditions included in the differential diagnosis, which may be challenging. WHAT IS NEW: • We provide an updated review of recent findings in the field CNO, including imaging and diagnostic strategies, associated inflammatory diseases and long-term outcomes data. • We focus particularly on the challenges encountered by clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. • We highlight knowledge gaps in the understanding and treatment of CNO, that should stimulate future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of PediatricsSame topicOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207