MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404788064 · doi:10.1109/tetci.2024.3500023

Adaptive Constrained IVAMGGMM: Application to Mental Disorders Detection

2024· article· en· W4404788064 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Azam, Nizar Bouguila

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsAlgoma UniversityConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for adaptable approaches to analyze extensive fMRI data is growing, focusing on capturing population patterns while preserving individual uniqueness. Independent component analysis (ICA) is increasingly used to uncover spatio-temporal patterns in brain imaging but struggles with separating correlated sources in multivariate data like fMRI. For that, we propose an ICA-based multivariate generalized Gaussian mixture model combined with the constrained ICA to form the cICA-MGGMM. This model relaxes the independence assumption of ICA. Also, we propose the adaptive constrained ICA-MGGMM (acICA-MGGMM) to adaptively control the association between reference signals and estimated sources. Independent vector analysis (IVA) calculates global spatial and temporal patterns from multi-subject fMRI data while preserving individual variability but performs poorly with large datasets and weak component correlations. This paper proposes integrating reference signals into the formulation to address the problem and provide guidance in high-dimensional situations. For that, we propose cIVA-MGGMM to address ICA limitations for multivariate data, offering a framework for references but relying on user-defined constraint parameters to enforce reference-estimated sources associations. To tackle these limitations, we introduce the adaptive cIVA-MGGMM (acIVA-MGGMM) to adapt and separate the activated brain sources. This model employs a full covariance matrix, which consider the feature correlation. Our four constrained methods incorporate prior information about the sources into the ICA and IVA models to address the limitations of ICA and IVA in high-dimensional data. We validate our models on simulation, Alzheimer's, Schizophrenia, EEG, and ADHD datasets, demonstrating superior performance over base models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it