MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404788100 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2024.3507035

HearLoc: Locating Unknown Sound Sources in 3D With a Small-Sized Microphone Array

2024· article· en· W4404788100 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaohui Li, Yongmin Zhang, Lin Cai, Yaoxue Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMicrophone arraySound (geography)MicrophoneSpeech recognitionAcousticsTelecommunicationsSound pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indoor Sound Source Localization (ISSL) is under growing focus with the rapid development of smart IOT intelligence. The predominant approaches typically involve constructing large microphone (Mic) array systems or extracting multiple angles of arrival (AOAs). However, the performance of these solutions is often constrained by the physical size of the array. Besides, there has been limited focus on 3D localization with a single small-sized Mic array. In this paper, we propose HearLoc, an ISSL system that can directly locate 3D sources with a ten-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$cm$</tex-math></inline-formula> Mic array. We demonstrate that the localization ability and dimensional capability can be significantly enhanced by incorporating the time differences of arrival (TDOAs) between the line-of-sight (LOS) and ECHO signals from nearby reflective surfaces. Our approach involves a localization method that selectively sums the correlation powers at useful TDOAs induced by each location. We also design a data processing pipeline with interpolation, normalization and pruning techniques to improve system accuracy and efficiency. To further enhance scalability, we design an iterative algorithm for the ISSL problem with multiple sources and an array location calibration scheme. Experiments demonstrate that the HearLoc can effectively locate sound sources, exhibiting <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2\times$</tex-math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.7\times$</tex-math></inline-formula> improvements in accuracy for 2D and 3D localization, respectively, and a <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4\times$</tex-math></inline-formula> increase in efficiency compared to the existing AOA-based ISSL solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207