MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404788734 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3507640

Cooperative Relaying for Connected Construction Equipment Networks With Hybrid Hierarchical Proximal Policy Optimization

2024· article· en· W4404788734 on OpenAlexaff
Pengfei Ning, Hongwei Wang, Tao Tang, Jie Zhang, Dusit Niyato, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Jiaotong University
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The communication network in a tunnel construction site facilitates real-time data exchange, and serves as a backbone for successfully executing construction projects. However, the long and closed spaces, irregular surfaces, and variable topology as tunnel excavation impose rigorous limitations on signal propagation, communication quality and coverage. To alleviate the realistic issues, we introduce a holistic three-phase cooperative relay scheme based on 5G New Radio (NR) vehicle-to-everything (V2X) architecture, which can extend the communication range and enhance network throughput. We theoretically derive the outage probability of the entire cooperative relaying process from source to destination, and quantify the impact of relaying on construction workflow with relay cost. To minimize the outage probability and relay cost, we formulate a cooperative relay strategies optimization problem and transform the solving procedure into a Markov decision process (MDP). We design a hybrid hierarchical proximal policy optimization (HH-PPO) reinforcement learning method to solve the MDP, which consists of two discrete actor networks, two continuous actor networks, and two critic networks. The hybrid structure enables HH-PPO to tackle the mixed action space, and the hierarchical structure enables adaptive and contextual actions generation by integrating the discrete network outputs into the continuous actor network. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the HH-PPO algorithm with faster convergence speed, and show superior performance in terms of lower, stable outage probability and relay cost satisfaction compared with another benchmark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207