MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404789647 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.197

Sustainability and risk considerations for the concurrent product and supply chain design

2024· article· en· W4404789647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSustainabilitySupply chainSupply chain risk managementProduct (mathematics)BusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Product designConcurrent engineeringSupply chain managementEngineeringOperations managementMarketingService management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The manufacturing landscape is evolving with a focus on sustainability, encompassing social, environmental, and profit dimensions and minimizing risk concerns. Hence, the design processes of products and supply chains should incorporate these objectives. Although this integration has been observed in the individual design of products and supply chains, it has been overlooked in the simultaneous design process. Thus, a multi-objective model is introduced for the concurrent product architecture and supply chain designs while considering sustainable and risk concerns. The model is solved using the weighted-sum method and implemented in three scenarios. The results highlight the importance of integrating sustainable and risk criteria in the concurrent design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it