MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404795247 · doi:10.1080/03066150.2024.2429480

The ‘terms and conditions’ of surveillance capitalism: theorizing agricultural data policy and governance

2024· article· en· W4404795247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Peasant Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCopyright and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersStewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute, University of British ColumbiaSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapitalismCorporate governanceAgricultureEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic systemPolitical economyBusinessSociologyPoliticsGeographyFinanceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the role of farm management platforms in agricultural data governance. While positioning farmers for surveillance over their farm operations, farmers themselves are also objects of ag-tech companies’ surveillance when using corporate farm management platforms. A systematic analysis of corporate data policies reveals how farm management platforms enact surveillance capitalism in agriculture. I argue that the data policies are performing an ‘illusion of data ownership’ to protect the supremely valuable data aggregates. This study presents novel empirical and theoretical contributions in response to recent calls for attention to data governance and surveillance capitalism in agricultural contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it