MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404795776 · doi:10.15354/si.24.re1097

Global Mean Surface Temperature: What Can We Learn from the Trajectory over a Millions-year Span?

2024· article· en· W4404795776 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Insights · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpan (engineering)TrajectoryLife spanSurface (topology)MathematicsPhysicsEngineeringMedicineGerontologyGeometryStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global mean surface temperature serves as a crucial metric in understanding the Earth’s climate dynamics, providing insights into long-term climate trends and variability. Over the course of a million years, the trajectory of global temperatures has been shaped by a multitude of factors, including natural climatic cycles, human activities, and external influences. By examining the historical trends and drivers influencing global mean surface temperature, researchers can gain valuable insights into the past, present, and future climate scenarios. This article delves into the intricate interplay of these factors and explores the lessons we can learn from studying the temperature trajectory over a million-year span.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience InsightsSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207