MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404799131 · doi:10.1029/2024gl111113

Amapari Marker Band, Gale Crater, Mars: Event Horizon With Highest Bedrock Iron and Zinc Concentrations Detected by <i>Curiosity's</i> Alpha Particle X‐Ray Spectrometer

2024· article· en· W4404799131 on OpenAlexafffund
L. M. Thompson, J. G. Spray, S. J. VanBommel, C. D. O’Connell‐Cooper, J. A. Berger, R. Gellert, A. R. Vasavada, Sanjeev Gupta, A. S. Yen, M. A. McCraig, N. I. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCanadian Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsImpact craterMars Exploration ProgramAlpha particleZincGeologyAlpha (finance)Event (particle physics)BedrockEvent horizonParticle (ecology)AstrobiologyPhysicsAstrophysicsMaterials scienceNuclear physicsGeomorphologyMetallurgyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alpha Particle X‐ray spectrometer (APXS) analyses of the distinct Amapari Marker Band (AMB), Gale crater, Mars reveal the highest, in situ, FeO and Zn abundances (47.51, 2.23 wt%), and elevated MnO associated with a lower rippled unit. APXS analyses also reveal a marked shift in provenance, to a generally basaltic composition, compared to the underlying Mg‐sulfate‐bearing strata, which persists into the overlying stratigraphy. The AMB also records perturbation in the MgSO 4 ‐forming conditions present above and below. AMB chemistry could be consistent with a volcanic ash source; high metal concentrations resulting from volatile reactions within an ash cloud. Alternatively, syn‐ and/or post‐depositional precipitation processes within a primary lake setting and/or a later diagenetic event or events may have played a role. Ongoing and future work will aim to further constrain processes responsible for deposition of the AMB, the high metal concentrations and its regional and global implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207