MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404800942 · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104146

The acute phase management of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) with polytrauma: A narrative review

2024· review· en· W4404800942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Spine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolytraumaMedicineSpinal cord injuryIntensive care medicineSpinal cordSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is frequently observed in polytrauma patients. What is the optimal strategy to manage tSCI in the setting of polytrauma? This narrative review focuses on: 1) extraspinal damage control surgery and resuscitation, 2) the perioperative protection of the injured spine during emergency surgery, 3) imaging and timing of spinal surgery in polytrauma, 4) early interventions for skin, bowel and bladder, and 5) the multidisciplinary approach to tSCI polytrauma patients. Damage control resuscitation (DCR) and damage control surgery (DCS), aim to prevent/correct post-traumatic physiological derangements to minimize bleeding until definitive hemostasis is achieved. Spinal protection during emergency surgery is of paramount importance to reduce secondary insults to the injured spine. Imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for decision-making regarding surgical management of the injured spine. Early decompressive surgery (within 24 h from trauma) is associated with better neurological outcomes. Early consultation with a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician is beneficial to optimize recovery. A close collaboration between different medical specialties involved in the early management of tSCI patients with polytrauma is advisable to improve outcome. This narrative review aims to collate basic knowledge regarding acute phase management of tSCI patients in the context of polytrauma. More evidence and data form well-powered studies are necessary in this setting. • Airway, breathing and circulation take priority in tSCI polytrauma patients. • Active bleeding requires immediate control. • MAP target for spinal cord perfusion need to be maintained when possible. • Damage control spine surgery should be considered in tSCI polytrauma patients. • The concept of rapid bleeding control should integrate into “the time is spine” approach. • Patients with a TBI need to be evaluated for possible co-existent SCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it