MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404801508 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.446

From Data to Decisions : Exploring Data Analytics in HR for Agile Organizational Decision Making

2024· article· en· W4404801508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAI and HR Technologies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAgile software developmentAnalyticsData scienceKnowledge managementData analysisProcess managementManagement scienceData miningSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper presents a novel formal framework designed for piloting human resources performance and fostering agile HR management within organizations. The framework facilitates the systematic collection of HR data, enabling the computation of sensitive Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) essential for predictive analytics and data-driven decision-making. Through this framework, top management gains a clear understanding of recruitment and training strategies, as well as the ability to distinguish between easily-replaceable and critical resources. The framework empowers organizations to optimize resource allocation, enhance operational efficiency, and mitigate risks associated with human capital management. The integration of predictive analytics enables the development of comprehensive dashboards, providing actionable insights to guide strategic HR initiatives and ensure organizational success in dynamic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it