MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404802881 · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115417

How peptide migration and fraction bioactivity are modulated by applied electrical current conditions during electromembrane process separation: A comprehensive machine learning-based peptidomic approach

2024· article· en· W4404802881 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Research International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsProcess (computing)PeptideCurrent (fluid)Fraction (chemistry)Electrical currentBiochemical engineeringComputer scienceChemistryBiological systemNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChromatographyBiologyEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A comprehensive and unique machine learning-based peptidomic approach. • Electrical current conditions modulate peptide separation and bioactivities. • 1 s/1s polarity reversal intensify the process despite peptides rapid reorientation. • 10 s/1s generates antibacterial recovery fraction and antifungal feed fraction. • The polarization concentration phenomena influence peptides’ selective migration. Industrial wastewaters are significant global concerns due to their environmental impact. Yet, protein-rich wastewaters can be valorized by enzymatic hydrolysis to release bioactive peptides. However, achieving selective molecular differentiation and eventually enhancing peptide bioactivities require costly cascades of membranes. In this study, a complex porcine cruor hydrolysate, containing 150 well-characterized peptides and demonstrating only an antifungal activity, was used as a model solution to evaluate the impact of current modes (continuous electrical current (CC), pulsed electric field (PEF) and polarity reversal (PR)) and the combination of pulse/pause-reversal pulse duration (10 s/1 s and 1 s/1 s) during peptides separation by an electromembrane process. The data analysis was assisted by a machine learning (ML)-based peptidomic approach to identify which of the 45 physicochemical characteristics of the peptides explain migration, or lack thereof, during electrodialysis with filtration membrane, a generic electromembrane process. The results demonstrated, for the first time, that electric current conditions modulate the population of recovered peptides and their associated fraction bioactivities. ML models identified the main features correlated to peptide migration, allowing tentative explanations of the underlying peptide selective migration phenomena. For CC-PEF 10 s/1 s–PR 10 s/1 s, isoelectric point (pI) (importance of 63.1%) and molecular weight (MW) (17.7%) were most important. For PEF 1 s/1 s, pI (53.9%), MW (23%) and GRAVY score (6.2%) played major roles. Finally, for PR 1 s/1 s, MW (82.5%), GRAVY score (5.5%) and tyrosine content (1.1%) were the key features. In addition, CC, PEF 10 s/1 s and PR 10 s/1 s allowed the production of two reusable fractions, an antibacterial recovery fraction and a feed fraction retaining antifungal activity, which aligns with the concept of circular economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it