Mobilisation des communautés rurales du littoral acadien dans l’action et la gouvernance climatique au Nouveau-Brunswick : les cas du Groupe de Développement durable du pays de Cocagne et de la Coopérative d’énergie renouvelable de Lamèque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La lutte contre les changements climatiques et l’adaptation à ses impacts passe par une mobilisation des communautés locales, en particulier dans le contexte du Nouveau-Brunswick, caractérisé par une faiblesse de la gouvernance locale. Nous illustrons ceci par deux initiatives sur le littoral acadien considérées comme exemplaires, celle du Groupe de développement durable du pays de Cocagne et celle de la Coopérative d’énergie renouvelable de Lamèque. Dans les deux cas, une action significative et efficace s’est mise en place en intégrant un nombre important d’acteurs locaux. Le consensus social a favorisé l’acceptabilité des projets. Néanmoins, la mise en place des initiatives nécessite un temps de maturation important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".