MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404808368 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.6613

The Top 5 Minor Ailments and Pharmacist Management in Ontario: Attachment and Primary Care

2024· article· en· W4404808368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eliot Frymire, Mina Tadrous, Kamila Premji, Richard H. Glazier, Paul L. Nguyen, Tara Kiran, Lynn Roberts, Michael Green

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Family Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacistMinor (academic)Primary careMedicineFamily medicineNursingPharmacyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Pharmacists represent the 3rd largest healthcare profession in Canada, after nurses and physicians, with 46,699 licensed to practice in 2022. Minor ailments (MAs) are health conditions that can be managed with low prescribed treatment and/or self-care strategies. In Ontario, Canada, pharmacists were given authority to deliver service for 19 MAs as of October 1, 2023. Objective: This study aims to identify and describe the characteristics of recipients of the five MAs most commonly managed by pharmacists. Setting: Ontario, Canada Study Design and Analysis: This study used linked health administrative data, including pharmacist billing for MA services, patient demographics, and physician and hospital billing data, collected for 15.4 million residents in Ontario. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for the delivery of specific MA services prescribed from January 1 to December 31, 2023, by primary care attachment. Models were adjusted for key recipient demographics and heatlcare utilization. Results: In 2023, 547,673 (3.6%) Ontario residents received at least one MA service, with the top 5 conditions being urinary tract infections (199,282 [36.4%]), conjunctivitis (153,021 [27.9%]), herpes labialis (46,659 [8.5%]), allergic rhinitis (41,521 [7.6%]), and atopic dermatitis/eczema/allergic contact dermatitis (39,365 [7.2%]). Comp ared to all other Ontario residents, MA service recipients were more likely to be attached to a primary care provider (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.92 [1.90-1.93]), be female (2.65 [2.63-2.67]), live in a higher income neighbourhood: 1.36 [1.35-1.37]), have a comorbidity (2.78 [2.76-2.91]) and use other pharmacy services (MedsCheck: 1.57 [1.55-1.58]; flu/COVID-19 vaccination: 1.69 [1.68-1.70]). In adjusted analyses, receipt of MA service remained significantly associated with primary care attachment (1.39 [1.37-1.40]). In adjusted analyses for each of the top MA services, recipients were significantly more likely to be attached with a primary care clinician: UTIs (1.41 [1.39-1.43]), conjunctivitis (1.69 [1.65-1.72]), Conclusion: MA prescribing by pharmacists was used by a small proportion of the population in the first year after introduction with more than half of visits relating to two ailments: UTIs and conjunctivitis. People living in higher income neighbourhoods and those with a primary care clinician were more likely to use MA services raising issues of equity and fragmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.416
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.087 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of Family MedicineSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207