MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404809420 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3507856

Improving IoRT Networks: Cross-Tier Resource Allocation for Multi-Antenna UAV Relays in SAGIN

2024· article· en· W4404809420 on OpenAlexaff
Foroogh S. Tabataba, Mohammad Sadegh Fazel, Mehdi Naderi Soorki, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource management (computing)Resource (disambiguation)Antenna (radio)Resource allocationComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to reducing power consumption while reducing equipment and maintaining high data rate requirements in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks (SAGIN) as part of the Internet of Remote Things (IoRT) networks, this paper proposes a system model and optimization scheme. Our modified architecture features multi-antenna Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) relays, gateway selection among existing UAVs for communication with satellite, and integration of Free Space Optic (FSO) space links to enhance air-space link data rates. The optimization problem aims to minimize the weighted sum of the number of gateways and the total UAV power consumption by jointly optimizing UAV deployment, UAV power allocation, gateway selection, and channel allocation. By jointly adopting proposed size-constrained PSO-K-means clustering, Simulated Annealing (SA) method, and Successive Convex Approximation (SCA) method, a two-stage scheme is devised to solve the proposed NP-hard and non-convex problem. Our simulation results indicate that an average performance improvement of 44% is achieved by our proposed scheme compared to the case where only clustering is performed. Furthermore, our proposed solution finds the number of gateways for different scenarios. For instance, almost all UAVs are selected as gateways to minimize UAV power consumption without considering any constraint on the number of gateways. Moreover, the performance difference between considering total UAV power consumption and only transmission power in the system optimization is shown. The results indicate that taking circuit power into account influences the selection of the number of gateways, as circuit power consumption is substantially higher than transmission power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207