MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404809874 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2024.3496717

An Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control Scheme for Heterogeneous Multiagent Systems

2024· article· en· W4404809874 on OpenAlexaff
Jianye Gong, Yajie Ma, Bin Jiang, Youmin Zhang, Li Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Fault toleranceMulti-agent systemComputer scienceDistributed computingControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an adaptive fault-tolerant control (FTC) scheme for heterogeneous multiagent systems with time-varying communication link faults and actuator faults. First, the communication link faults, including the channel signal fading and cyber bias attack, is considered, and the communication link fault compensation controller is designed through introducing the adaptive signals with the estimate of the norms of the faulty matrix. Then, by using the minimum eigenvalue of the control gain matrix, the minimum-eigenvalue-based adaptive fault-tolerant controller is proposed to compensate for the time-varying actuator loss of effectiveness and bias faults. Moreover, the convergence performance analysis of the developed FTC algorithm is given based on the Lyapunov theory. The simulation results carried out on the quadrotors-unmanned ground vehicles formation systems validate the effectiveness of the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207