Reassessing mirtazapine and akathisia: A case report on its efficacy in treating severe, treatment-resistant akathisia and a review of the evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antipsychotic-induced akathisia is a distressing movement disorder marked by intense internal restlessness and an urge to move. This report discusses a 44-year-old man with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who developed severe, treatment-resistant akathisia after taking haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic. Standard treatments for antipsychotic-induced akathisia, including benzodiazepines (Clonazepam) and benztropine, failed to alleviate the patient's persistent symptoms, causing considerable distress. However, the introduction of mirtazapine at a low dose of 15 mg led to substantial improvement, as indicated by a gradual reduction in the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale score from 8 to 0 and improvements in mood, mobility, and daily activity participation. This case highlights the potential efficacy of mirtazapine in treating severe, resistant akathisia, adding to its established use in antipsychotic-induced akathisia management and contributing to the limited literature on its application in patients unresponsive to other conventional treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".