Prevalence and Interplay between Borderline Personality Disorder and Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Saudi Arabian University Students: A Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a personality disorder characterized by instability in affect regulation, impulse control, and social interactions. There has been a long-term curiosity among researchers about the reasons for underlying BPD. One such implication is Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE). This study aimed to find out the correlation between BPD and ACE in the context of Saudi Arabian University students. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) play a significant role in the personality traits leading to BPD in adults, and we hypothesize that there is a significant relationship between ACEs and the occurrence of BPD among young college students at King Abdulaziz University. There is very limited published data regarding Gulf countries, including case reports, reviews, and meta-analyses. Material and Methods: The study was conducted among Saudi Arabian University students aged between 18 and 30. This cross-sectional study at King Abdul-Aziz University involved a total of 1970 subjects. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic characteristics, the Mclean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD), and the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire for Adults. Results: Our study found that amongst the total subjects undertaken, 41.2% were at a high risk of developing BPD. This is in direct correlation with 61.4% that suffered previous childhood trauma. Amongst the total subjects undertaken for the study, 43.6% of university students experienced ACE; symptoms were associated with smoking, having at least one family member diagnosed with a mental disorder, being divorced, and having a deceased mother. Conclusion: BPD and ACE are positively correlated, as both have implications for other life-determining factors of the subjects. The study presents the first cross-sectional data set for Saudi Arabian students involving BPD and ACE. This study is significant as it specifically focuses on university students in Saudi Arabia. It suggests that counseling services on all university campuses should be required to facilitate regular evaluation and support for students' mental health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".