MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404815560 · doi:10.21240/merz/2012.2.17

Kinder und Werbung im Internet

2012· article· de· W4404815560 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Hajok

Bibliographic record

Venuemerz | medien + erziehung · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Innovation in Industries
Canadian institutionsMiller Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Es war in den letzten Jahren nicht unbedingt still um das Thema „Werbung im Internet“, aber der besorgte Blick von Eltern und Fachkräften aus Pädagogik und Jugendschutz richtete sich eher auf andere Problembereiche. Als im Herbst 2011 der Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (VZBV) erneut mit einer Abmahnwelle gegen Kinderspielseiten wetterte, wurde kurz aufgehorcht, waren doch auch populäre Angebote wie spielaffe.de, toggo.de und kika.de betroffen. Und die berechtigte Forderung nach Werbekompetenzvermittlung in der pädagogischen Praxis ist wieder lauter geworden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemerz | medien + erziehungSame topicDigital Innovation in IndustriesFrench-language works237,207