Masu salmon species complex relationships and sex chromosomes revealed from analyses of the masu salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus masou masou</i>) genome assembly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) are the only Pacific salmon endemic to Asia. Some researchers prefer to categorize these salmon into 4 subspecies (masu-Oncorhynchus masou masou, amago-Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae, Biwa-Oncorhynchus masou subsp., and Formosan-Oncorhynchus masou formosanus), while others prefer individual species designations. Even though the masu salmon fishery is thousands of years old, classification of the diversity within the masu salmon species complex remains elusive. In this study, a genetic map and reference genome assembly were generated for 1 species/subspecies (masu) to provide resources for understanding the species complex. In O. m. masou, the sex chromosome was determined to be chromosome 7. Resequenced genomes from 2 other putative subspecies (amago and Biwa) provided evidence that they do not share the same sex chromosome. Principal component and admixture analyses clustered the amago and Biwa salmon close together. This supported previous findings of a close relationship between amago and Biwa salmon and a more distant relationship to masu salmon for both. Additional analyses of the masu salmon species complex will benefit from using the new reference genome assembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".