MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Designing Infographics – A Manual for Health Care Provider Learners and Practitioners

2024· book· en· W4404818520 on OpenAlexaff
James M. Thompson, Gail Macartney, Stephanie Welton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Coding and Health Information
Canadian institutionsHealth PEIUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfographicHealth careMedical educationNursingMedicineComputer sciencePolitical scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infographics are combinations of text and imagery commonly used in health care to summarize complex information in a story for health care learners, providers, patients or other audiences. Infographics are used in health care higher education both for teaching and for learners’ projects. Family Medicine residents, Nurse Practitioner students and others often make infographics (handouts, one-pagers or brochures) for their scholarly projects. Our objective for this manual was to summarize published evidence for the basic principles of infographics development with an emphasis on the design phase. Our primary audience for this manual is health care provider learners and practitioners. Our goal is to help them share evidence-based information with colleagues and the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Coding and Health InformationFrench-language works237,207