Impact of a Dynamic Orthosis on Manual Dexterity Among People With Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: A dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis could be a novel nonpharmacological treatment of motor symptoms among people with Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the orthosis in improving manual dexterity among people with PD. DESIGN: A randomized trial with 60 participants (control group, n = 20; experimental group, n = 40). Manual dexterity was assessed in on-off states of the disease, with and without the orthosis. SETTING: Burgos University Hospital (Burgos, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive nonprobabilistic sampling. Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with PD, had motor symptoms in at least one upper limb, and attended the hospital's neurology department. Participants were ages 48 to 89 yr, with an average disease duration of 5.38 yr (SD = 4.23). Exclusion criteria were tremor due to another neurological disease or a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≤26. INTERVENTION: The experimental group used the orthosis on the most affected upper limb for 2 mo; the control group participants did not receive the orthosis. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Manual dexterity was measured with the Purdue Pegboard Test, Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test, and Square Test. Paired t tests for related samples and analysis of covariance tests were used. RESULTS: Some participants improved on some manual dexterity items while wearing the orthosis. However, it was not sustained when the orthosis was removed after 2 mo of use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The orthosis may improve certain aspects of manual dexterity and functionality among people with PD, but only while it is worn. Plain-Language Summary: The common motor symptoms and declines in manual dexterity that people with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience can significantly affect their ability to perform activities of daily living as well as their quality of life. Manual dexterity is a strong predictor of the level of functional independence for people with PD. This study evaluated the efficacy of an elastomeric fabric orthosis to improve manual dexterity for people with PD. The study found that while wearing the orthosis the motor symptoms of PD were reduced and manual dexterity and upper limb functionality improved. Wearing the orthosis has the potential to enhance functionality, foster greater autonomy, and substantially improve the quality of life of people with PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".