Plant Microbe Interaction—Predicting the Pathogen Internalization Through Stomata Using Computational Neural Network Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foodborne disease presents a substantial challenge to researchers, as foliar water intake greatly influences pathogen internalization via stomata. Comprehending plant–pathogen interactions, especially under fluctuating humidity and temperature circumstances, is crucial for formulating ways to prevent pathogen ingress and diminish foodborne hazards. This study introduces a computational model utilizing neural networks to anticipate pathogen internalization via stomata, contrasting with previous research that emphasized biocontrol techniques. Computational modeling assesses the likelihood and duration of internalization for bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella enterica (S. enterica), considering various environmental factors including humidity and temperature. The estimated likelihood ranges from 0.6200 to 0.8820, while the internalization time varies from 4000 s to 5080 s, assessed at 50% and 100% humidity levels. The difference in internalization time, roughly 1042.73 s shorter at 100% humidity, correlates with a 26.2% increase in the likelihood of internalization, rising from 0.6200 to 0.8820. A neural network model has been developed to quantitatively predict these values, thereby enhancing the understanding of plant–microbe interactions. These methods will aid researchers in understanding plant–pathogen interactions, especially in environments characterized by varying humidity and temperature and are essential for formulating strategies to prevent pathogen ingress and tackle foodborne illnesses within a technologically advanced context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".