Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo apresenta uma discussão sobre o avanço do neoliberalismo no contexto brasileiro e como este processo interfere no campo trabalhista. Compreendendo a ideologia neoliberal enquanto uma racionalidade (DARDOT, LAVAL, 2016) que atravessa diversas esferas da vida social, entre elas a construção do Estado, o qual se apresenta enquanto Estado-empresa, e a própria formação do indivíduo neoliberal, sujeito à constante competição. Nesta composição social temos a categoria dos entregadores por aplicativos que foram atingidos por processos de precarização do trabalho potencializados pela pandemia de Covid-19. Nessa conjuntura, há movimentos de resistência apresentados pela categoria, movimentos que se apresentaram nas ruas, como o Breque dos Apps, e também ocuparam pautas no campo midiático, espaço no qual se destacou Paulo Roberto da Silva Lima (Galo). Desta forma, tendo como recorte a presença midiática de Paulo Galo, recorreremos à Análise do Discurso como metodologia na compreensão das disputas ideológicas apresentadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".