CCC2023_possibilities of obtaining energy from aerodynamic phenomena occurring in selected housing estates in Warsaw, Poland
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study uses wind tunnel experiments to explore the potential for harnessing wind energy from aerodynamic phenomena in selected housing estates in Warsaw, Poland. Aimed at addressing the challenges posed by the European ‘Fit for 55’ resolution, our research focuses on the energy recovery capabilities of large-panel technology buildings established in the latter half of the twentieth century. We aim to provide a roadmap for integrating wind energy solutions into urban planning and design by analyzing the aerodynamic effects within urban environments. Our methodology includes qualitative assessments of wind patterns around residential neighbourhoods and their impact on potential wind energy utilization. Results indicate that specific urban configurations can significantly enhance the efficiency of wind energy harvesting, offering a promising avenue for sustainable urban development. This study contributes to the growing field of renewable energy research by highlighting the untapped potential of urban wind resources and proposing design considerations for future architectural projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it