Postnatal growth of etiologically characterized preterm newborns according to gestational age at birth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between etiologically-based preterm birth sub-groups and early postnatal growth according to gestational age at birth. METHODS: Prospective, multinational, cohort study involving 15 hospitals that monitored preterm newborns to hospital discharge. Measures/exposures: maternal demographics; etiologically-based preterm birth sub-groups; very, moderate and late preterm categories, and feeding. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: preterm postnatal growth standards. RESULTS: We included 2320 singletons and 1180 twins: very=24.4% (n = 856, including 178 < 28 weeks' gestation); moderate=16.9% (n = 592) and late preterm=58.6% (n = 2052). The median (interquartile range) postmenstrual age at the last measure was 37 (36-38) weeks. The 'no main condition' sub-group percentage increased from early to late preterm; the 'perinatal sepsis' sub-group percentage decreased. 'Perinatal sepsis', 'suspected IUGR' and 'fetal distress' very and late preterm infants had lower postnatal growth patterns than the 'no main condition' reference sub-group. This pattern persisted in late but not very preterm infants when postnatal growth was corrected for weight z-score at birth. CONCLUSION: The proportional contribution of etiologically-based preterm sub-groups and their postnatal growth trajectories vary by preterm category. Postnatal growth is partially independent of fetal growth in the majority of preterm infants (i.e., those born late preterm). IMPACT: Preterm birth, the leading cause of under-5 mortality, is a highly heterogenous syndrome, with surviving infants at risk of suboptimal growth, morbidity, and impaired neurodevelopment. Both the proportional contribution of etiologically-based sub-groups and their postnatal growth trajectories vary by preterm category (very/moderate/late). The 'perinatal sepsis', 'suspected IUGR' and 'fetal distress' sub-groups amongst very and late preterm infants had lower postnatal growth than the 'no main condition' preterm infants. The pattern persisted after adjusting for birth size only in the late preterms. Postnatal growth is partially independent of fetal growth in the majority of preterm infants (i.e., those born late preterm).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".